Статья 'Оппозиция «Мир - Война» как явление гибридной политической реальности' - журнал 'Политика и Общество' - NotaBene.ru
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > Requirements for publication > Peer-review process > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy
Journals in science databases
About the Journal
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Politics and Society
Reference:

“Peace-War” opposition as a phenomenon of hybrid political reality

Shamakhov Vladimir Aleksandrovich

Director, North-West Institute of Management – branch of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration under the President of the Russian Federation

199178, Russia, Saint Petersburg oblast', g. Saint Petersburg, ul. Srednii Prospekt, V.o., 57/43

sziu@sziu.ranepa.ru
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 
Kovalev Andrei Andreevich

PhD in Politics

Associate Professor at the North-West Institute of Management, branch of RANEPA

199178, Russia, Sankt-Peterburg oblast', g. Saint Petersburg, ul. Srednii Prospekt, V.o., 57/43

senator23@yandex.ru
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0684.2018.7.26736

Review date:

30-06-2018


Publish date:

31-07-2018


Abstract: The goal of this research is the problem of hybridism on the example of “peace-war” opposition and its dualistic nature reflected in the works of the prominent scholar of the past and modernity. This goal is specified by the following tasks: 1) to determine hybridism in its political aspect and connection with governance and civilized identity; 2) to examine the hybrid concepts of war in the fundamental for social philosophy and political science texts; 3) to consider the hybrid concepts of the world in classical works of the military theoreticians; 4) to study the problem of the dynamics of military conflicts and their renewal. The “peace” and “war” are the closely related, transitioning into one another phenomena of political reality of hybrid nature. The thinkers of the past and modernity came to the valid and still relevant conclusions on the nature of war, same as the military theoreticians left behind multiple valuable observations on the nature of peaceful existence. In the era of civilizational antagonism and possible civilizational conflicts, the border between the state of peace and war becomes vague, including as a result of escalation of the unresolved in the past geopolitical and sociocultural problems.


Keywords: civilizational conflict, security, global security, the confrontation of civilizations, political reality, hybridism, war, peace, political science, globalization
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Gorokhov P.A., Yuzhaninova E.R. Traktat Immanuila Kanta «K vechnomu miru»: vozmozhnost' realizatsii proekta // Teoriya i praktika obshchestvennogo razvitiya. 2015. № 11. S. 188-190.
2.
Kant I. Sobranie sochinenii v 8 tomakh. Tom 7. M., 1994. 495 c.
3.
Klauzevits K. O voine. T. 1. M.: Terra Fantastica, AST, 2002. 560 s.
4.
Liddel Gart B.G. Entsiklopediya voennogo iskusstva. M, SPb: AST, Terra Fantastika, 1999. 649 s.
5.
Shamakhov V.A., Kovalev A.A. Vlastnye mekhanizmy obespecheniya voennoi bezopasnosti Rossiiskoi Federatsii v epokhu protivostoyaniya tsivilizatsii. M.:RIOR, 2018. 256 s.
6.
Shamakhov V.A., Kovalev A.A. Voennaya bezopasnost' Rossii i informatsionnaya politika strany v epokhu konfliktnogo protivostoyaniya tsivilizatsii. M.:RIOR, 2019. 184 s.
7.
Shmitt K. Ponyatie politicheskogo // Voprosy sotsiologii. 1992. № 1. S. 37-67.
8.
Augustine of Hippo. City of God: De Civitate Dei contra Paganos. limovia.net, 2013. 808 p.
9.
Bain W. The Empire of Security and the Safety of the People. Routledge, 2006. 236 p.
10.
Barkawi T., Brighton S. Conclusion: Absent war studies? War, knowledge and critique // The changing character of war. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2011. pp. 524-542.
11.
Boege V. Vying for legitimacy in post-conflict situations: the Bougainville case// [Elektronnyi resurs] URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/271673808_Vying_for_legitimacy_in_post-conflict_situations_the_Bougainville_case (data obrashcheniya: 30.06.2018)
12.
Brown.A., Gusmao A. Peacebuilding and Political Hybridity in East Timor // Peace Review. 2009. Vol. 21, No.1. pp. 61-69.
13.
Feltham O. Anatomy of Failure. Bloomsbury Academic, 2013. 304 p.
14.
Galtung J. A Synthetic Approach to Peace Thinking // [Elektronnyi resurs] URL: https://www.transcend.org/files/Galtung_Book_unpub_Theories_of_Peace_-_A_Synthetic_Approach_to_Peace_Thinking_1967.pdf
15.
Gates S., Mokleiv H., Trappeniers E. Conflict Recurrence // [Elektronnyi resurs] URL: https://www.prio.org/utility/DownloadFile.ashx?id=9&type=publicationfile (data obrashcheniya: 30.06.2018)
16.
Hobbes T. On the Citizen. Cambridge University Press, 1998. 266 p.
17.
Kaldor M., Martin M., Selchow S. Human Security: A New Strategic Narrative for Europe // International Affairs. 2007. Vol. 83, No. 2. pp. 273-288.
18.
Lawler P. Peace Research, War, and the Problem of Focus // Peace Review. 2002. Vol. 14, No.1. pp. 7-14.
19.
Mac Ginty R., Richmond O. The local turn in peace building: a critical agenda for peace // Third World Quarterly. 2013. Vol. 34, No.5. pp. 763–783.
20.
Metz S., Cuccia P. Defining War for the 21st Century / 2010 SSI Annual Strategy Conference Report // [Elektronnyi resurs] URL: https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/report/2011/ssi_metz-cuccia.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 30.06.2018)
21.
Orend B. Justice after war // Ethics and International Affairs. 2002. Vol. 16, No. 1. 43–56
22.
Piiparinen T. The Transformation of UN Conflict Management. Routledge, 2010. 227 p.
23.
Prabhu A. Hybridity: Limits, Transformations, Prospects. The State University of New York Press, 2012. 204 p.
24.
Prokhovnik R., Slomp G. International Political Theory after Hobbes. Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2011. 216 p.
25.
Ramsbotham O., Miall H., Woodhouse T. Contemporary Conflict Resolution. Polity press, 2011. 507 p.
26.
Rawls J. The Law of Peoples. Harvard University Press, 2000. 207 r.
27.
Richmond O. P. The Dilemmas of a Hybrid Peace // [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: http://www.e-ir.info/2012/12/23/the-dilemmas-of-a-hybrid-peace (data obrashcheniya: 30.06.2018)
28.
Rose G. How Wars End. NY. Simon & Schuster, 2010. 432 p.
29.
Scruton R. Immanuel Kant and the Iraq war // [Elektronnyi resurs] URL: https://www.opendemocracy.net/faith-iraqwarphiloshophy/article_1749.jsp (data obrashcheniya: 30.06.2018)
30.
Scruton R. Why Iraq is a Write-Off // [Elektronnyi resurs] URL: https://www.forbes.com/sites/rogerscruton/2014/06/23/why-iraq-is-a-write-off/#4257e1744c1d (data obrashcheniya: 30.06.2018)
31.
Strachan H., Scheipers S. The Changing Character of War. Oxford University Press, 2014. 576 p.
32.
Sylvester C. War as Experience: Contributions from International Relations and Feminist Analysis. Routledge, 2013. 150 p.
33.
Wallis J. A liberal-local hybrid peace project in action? The increasing engagement between the local and liberal in Timor-Leste // Review of International Studies. 2012. Vol. 38, pp. 735-761.
34.
Walzer M. Arguing about War. Yale University Press, 2005. 208 p.
35.
Zwitter A., Hoelzl M. Augustine on War and Peace // Peace Review. 2014. Vol. 26, No. 3. pp. 317-324
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website