Статья 'Постглобализация и политическая архаизация в России. ' - журнал 'Мировая политика' - NotaBene.ru
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial board
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!
При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.
По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
World Politics
Reference:

Post-globalization and political archaization in Russia

Erokhov Il'ya

PhD in Politics

Senior Researcher at the Sector of the History of Political Philosophy of the Institute of Philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences

109240, Russia, g. Moscow, ul. Goncharnaya, 12 str. 1., kab. 411

podelam@bk.ru

DOI:

10.25136/2409-8671.2020.2.33335

Review date:

29-06-2020


Publish date:

15-08-2020


Abstract: The purpose of the article is political and philosophical insight into the problem of global disintegration - the main characteristic of the modern stage of international relations, which the author of the work suggests naming a “post-globalization”. The author substantiates the hypothesis about the completion of globalization and the beginning of a post-global period in international relations. The article also reveals the thesis about archaization of politics in modern Russia as a reaction to the beginning of post-globalization. The work contains a methodology paragraph which enunciates the concept of two typical forms of reaction to postglobal changes in international relations. This theory serves as a methodological basis for the applied analysis and the conclusion that archaization of politics has converted Russia from a global power to a regional country. In a wide historical sense, archaization of Russia’s politics proves that the post-Soviet period has been completed in post-Soviet states. Globalization, which is understood as a global integration process, has been completed. In global politics and economics, a centrifugal ideology of disintegration and separation, manifested in a dramatic self-isolation of countries and the beginning of a new “enclosure” of national socio-economic systems, has replaced the strategies of unification. Russia has responded to the current international situation with archaization of both external and internal policies. This path is strategically wrong, and speaks for a degradation of the country’s politics. Improper political reaction to post-globalization has already driven Russia out from the top-list of the countries of influence to the regionally significant countries whose influence is more prominent within their region. The research subjects the author takes as a basis - post-globalization and archaization of Russia’s politics - haven’t been studied sufficiently enough in Russian world literature. At the same time, these problems seem to be urgent, since the author comes to the conclusion that Russia is not ready for the post-global epoch. 
 


Keywords: development strategies, politics, regionalization, archaization of politics, end of post-soviet period, post-global world, post-globalization, globalization, international relations, global crisis
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Akhiezer A. S. Arkhaizatsiya v rossiiskom obshchestve kak metodologicheskaya problema // Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost'. 2001. № 2. S. 89–100.
2.
Glinchikova A. G., Stepanyants M. T., Sineokaya Yu. V. Arkhaizatsiya: povorot vspyat' ili mobilizatsiya k budushchemu? // Filosofskii zhurnal. 2017. T. 10. No 3. S. 133–152. DOI: 10.21146/2072-0726-2017-10-3-133-152
3.
D'yui Dzh. Obshchestvo i ego problemy. M.: Ideya-Press, 2002. 160 s.
4.
Isakov A. L. Proyavlenie arkhaizatsii v sovremennoi rossiiskoi politicheskoi real'nosti [Elektronnyi resurs] // Sovremennye issledovaniya sotsial'nykh problem (Elektronnyi nauchnyi zhurnal), Modern Research of Social Problems. 2013. № 10(30). . URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/270505864_MANIFESTATIONS_OF_ARCHAIZATION_IN_MODERN_RUSSIAN_POLITICAL_REALITY (data obrashcheniya: 12.10.2019). DOI: 10.12731/2218-7405-2013-10-2
5.
Kont O. Dukh pozitivnoi filosofii. (Slovo o polozhitel'nom myshlenii). Rostov n/D: Feniks. 2003. 256 s.
6.
Mal'tus T. Opyt zakona o narodonaselenii. M.: Izdatel'stvo K. T. Soldatenkova. 1895. 250 c.
7.
Mal'tus T. R. Opyt o zakone narodonaseleniya. SPb.: 1868.; M.: Direktmedia Pablishing. 2008. 465 c.
8.
Marks K. Manifest kommunisticheskoi partii // Marks K., Engel's F. Sochineniya. M.: Gosudarstvennoe izdatel'stvo politicheskoi literatury. 1955. 2-e izd. T. 4. 615 c.
9.
Pak S.-Ch. Protektsionizm SShA i narushenie torgovogo balansa mezhdu SShA i stranami Severo-Vostochnoi Azii // Vestnik mezhdunarodnykh organizatsii. 2018. T. 13. № 2. S. 76-100 (na russkom i angliiskom yazykakh). DOI: 10.17323/1996-7845-2018-02-05
10.
Przhilenskii V. I., Przhilenskaya I. B. Sotsial'naya arkhaizatsiya: eksplikatsiya, opertsionalizatsiya, kontseptualizatsiya [Elektronnyi resurs] // Voprosy filosofii. 2019. Vypusk № 5. C. 37-48. Dostup dlya zaregistrirovannykh pol'zovatelei. URL: http://ras.jes.su/vphil/s004287440005054-4-1 (data obrashcheniya: 12.10.2019). DOI: 10.31857/S004287440005054-4
11.
Ryabov A. V. Vozrozhdenie feodal'noi «arkhaiki» v sovremennoi Rossii: praktika i idei // Rabochie tetradi. Working Paper. M.: Moskovskii tsentr Karnegi. 2008. № 4. C. 4-14.
12.
Sen-Simon A. Izbrannye sochineniya. Tom 1. Moskva - Leningrad: Izdatel'stvo Akademii nauk SSSR. 1948. 470 s.
13.
Burris W. C. Protectionism and anti-globalization. New York, NY: Nova Science Publishers, 2010. p. 255.
14.
Capital Market Liberalization and Development / Ed. by J. A. Ocampo and J. E. Stiglitz. Oxford University Press. 2008. 375 p.
15.
Economou C., Kaitelidou D., Katsikas D., Siskou O., Zafiropoulou M. Impacts of the economic crisis on access to healthcare services in Greece with a focus on the vulnerable groups of the population1 // Social Cohesion and Development, 9 (2), 2016. P. 99-115. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12681/scad.8880
16.
Ephraim C., Sovan M., Octave J. Post global financial crisis modelling: credit risk for firms that are too big to fail // International Journal of Financial Markets and Derivatives. 2019. Vol. 7. No. 1. P. 15-39. DOI: 10.1504/IJFMD.2019.101235
17.
Flew T., Populism and Globalization: Towards a Post-Global Era? [Elektronnyi resurs]. January 22. 2019. R. 1-44. Dostup dlya zaregistrirovannykh pol'zovatelei. URL:(data obrashcheniya: 12.10.2019) http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3321448
18.
Gills B. K. The Return of Crisis in the Era of Globalization: One Crisis, or Many? // Globalizations. 7:1-2, Routledge. 2010. P. 3-8, DOI: 10.1080/14747731003592978
19.
Heartfield J. Demobilising the nation: The decline of sovereignty in Western Europe // International Politics. № 46. 2009. P. 712–731. DOI:10.1057/ip.2009.21
20.
Kutlina-Dimitrova Z., Lakatos C., The Global Costs of Protectionism // Policy Research Working Paper. December. 2017. № 8277. World Bank Group. P. 1-33.
21.
Leigh J., Beyond Peak Oil in Post Globalization Civilization Clash [Elektronnyi resurs] // The Open Geography Journal. № 1(1). October. 2008. P. 15-24. . URL: https://benthamopen.com/contents/pdf/TOGEOGJ/TOGEOGJ-1-15.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 12.10.2019) DOI: 10.2174/1874923200801010015
22.
Martens P., Dreher A., Gaston N. Globalisation, the global village and the civil society // Futures Volume 42, Issue 6. August. 2010. P. 574-582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2010.01.008
23.
Pieterse J. N. Periodizing Globalization: Histories of Globalization // New Global Studies, Vol. 6: Iss. 2, Article 1. 2012. P. 1-25. DOI: 10.1515/1940-0004.1174
24.
Pati A. P. Credit Risk Stress Testing Practices in BRICS: Post-global Financial Crisis Scenario // Global Business Review. 2017. 18 (4). P. 1-19. DOI: 10.1177/0972150917692269
25.
Sitnikov A. P., Levashov D. N., Mareev V. I. Archaizations in a Space of Sociocultural Transformation: A Theoretical Aspect. Journal of History Culture and Art Research. 2019. № 8 (2). P. 34-42. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.7596/taksad.v8i2.2151
26.
Wilson E. K., Steger M. B. Religious Globalisms in the Post-Secular Age // Globalizations. 10:3. Routledge. 2013. P. 481-495. DOI: 10.1080/14747731.2013.787774
27.
Yakovleva N., Frei R., Murthy S. R. Sustainable development goals and sustainable supply chains in the post-global economy // Greening of Industry Networks Studies. Springer. Heidelberg. 2019. 240 p. DOI:10.1007/978-3-030-15066-2
28.
Vallerstain I. Evropeiskii universalizm: ritorika vlasti // PROGNOZIΣ. № 2 (14). 2008. C. 3-56.
29.
Khabermas Yu. Modern – nezavershennyi proekt // Voprosy filosofii. 1992. № 4. S. 40-51
30.
Gutorov V. Modernizatsiya protiv globalizatsii: o nekotorykh paradoksakh sovremennoi interpretatsii // Filosofiya politiki i prava. MGU. №10 2019 C. 48-59.
31.
Giddens E. Nespokoinyi i mogushchestvennyi kontinent: Chto zhdet Evropu v budushchem? M.: Izdatel'skii dom «Delo». RANKhiGS. 2015. 240 s.
32.
Bauman 3. Globalizatsiya. Posledstviya dlya cheloveka i obshchestva. M.: Ves' Mir. 2004. 188 s.
33.
Kheld D., Gol'dblatt D., Makgryu E., Perraton Dzh. Global'nye transformatsii: Politika, ekonomika, kul'tura. M.: Praksis. 2004. xxiv, 576 s.
34.
Giddens E. Posledstviya sovremennosti. M.: Izdatel'skaya i konsaltingovaya gruppa «Praksis». 2011. 352 s.
35.
Mnogolikaya globalizatsiya / Pod red. P. Bergera i S. Khantingtona. M.: Aspekt Press. 2004. 379 s.
36.
Mezhuev V. M. Tsennosti sovremennosti v kontekste modernizatsii i globalizatsii [Elektronnyi resurs] // Elektronnyi zhurnal «Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie». 2009. № 1. Filosofiya. Politologiya. URL: http://zpu-journal.ru/e-zpu/2009/1/Mezhuev/ [arkhivirovano v WebCite] (data obrashcheniya: 13.07.2020)
37.
Erokhov I. A. Novaya situatsiya politicheskogo znaniya: trud, kontrol' i obraz budushchego // Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya. 2018. № 4. S. 115-129. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2018.04.09
38.
Asemoglu D., Robinson Dzh. A. Ekonomicheskie istoki diktatury i demokratii. M.: Izd. dom Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki. 2015. 512 s.
39.
Piketti T. Kapital v XXI veke. M.: Ad Marginem Press. 2015. 592 s.
40.
Taleb N. Chernyi lebed'. Pod znakom nepredskazuemosti (sbornik). M.: Azbuka-Attikus, 2010. 355 s.
41.
Paneyakh E. Otmiranie gosudarstva Rossiiskoe obshchestvo mezhdu postmodernom i arkhaikoi [Elektronnyi resurs] // Nizovaya modernizatsiya Mogut li obshchestvo i gosudarstvo dvigat'sya v raznykh napravleniyakh? InLiberty 30.11.2018 URL: https://www.inliberty.ru/article/modern-paneyakh/ (data obrashcheniya: 20.07.2020)
42.
Marks K., Engel's F. Sochineniya. T. 23. M.: Gosudarstvennoe izdatel'stvo politicheskoi literatury. 1960. 2-e izd. 908 s.
43.
Vallerstain I. Kapitalizm: protivnik rynka? // Logos 5 (56) 2006. S. 9-13.
44.
Krasnov M. Konstitutsiya — zhertva konstitutsii? // Politicheskii stroi Rossii: vchera, segodnya, zavtra. M.: Mysl'. 2019. 159 s.
45.
Gel'man V. Ya. «Nedostoinoe pravlenie»: politika v sovremennoi Rossii. SPb.: Izdatel'stvo Evropeiskogo universiteta v Sankt-Peterburge. 2019. 254 s.
46.
Lukashuk I. I. Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. Obshchaya chast': ucheb. dlya studentov yurid. fak. i vuzov. Ros. akad. Nauk. Izd. 3 M.: Volters Kluver. 2005. 432 s.
47.
Politicheskoe razvitie Rossii. 2014–2016 : Instituty i praktiki avtoritarnoi konsolidatsii. M.: Fond «Liberal'naya Missiya». 2016. 216 s.
48.
Kapustin B. Tsivilizatsiya blefa [Elektronnyi resurs] // Rossiya v global'noi politike. № 3. 2020. URL: https://globalaffairs.ru/articles/czivilizacziya-blefa/ (data obrashcheniya: 20.07.2020)
49.
Dewey J. Outlines of a Critical Theory of Ethics // The Early Works, 1889-1892 of John Dewey, Volume 3: 1882–1898, Essays and Outlines of a Critical Theory of Ethics. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press. 1969. 496 p.
50.
Shumpeter I. Kapitalizm, Sotsializm i Demokratiya. M.: Ekonomika 1995. 540 s.
51.
Lyotard J.-F. Reponse a la question: Qu'est ce que le postmoderne? // Critique. - Para. 1982. N. 37/419. P. 357-367.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website