Статья 'Проблема глобального управления в современной научной литературе Запада: основные подходы и концепции' - журнал 'Мировая политика' - NotaBene.ru
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial board
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!
При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.
По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
World Politics

The global governance problem in the modern Western academic literature: the main approaches and concepts

Kovalev Andrei Andreevich

PhD in Politics

Associate Professor at the North-West Institute of Management, branch of RANEPA

199178, Russia, Sankt-Peterburg oblast', g. Saint Petersburg, ul. Srednii Prospekt, V.o., 57/43

Другие публикации этого автора

Knyazeva Ekaterina Yur'evna

Postgraduate at the Department of Public and Municipal Management of North-West Institute of Management

199178, Russia, Saint Petersburg oblast', g. Saint Petersburg, ul. Srednii Pr. V.o., 57/43




Review date:


Publish date:


Abstract: The global governance theories assessment is among the poorly studied problems in Russian political science, though its topicality in the modern age of civilizational confrontation is beyond dispute. Primarily, the necessity to study the key global governance concepts is determined by the need for establishing effective relations with the Western and the Eastern countries. The purpose of the article is to analyze and estimate the main foreig global governance concepts, and it is achieved by solving the following tasks: 1) to consider the main definitions of global governance; 2) to detect the problem of legitimacy in international relations; 3) to consider the legitimacy of global governance. The authors give special attention to the underestimated source of global governance legitimacy - the liberal legal principles. As a political program, global governance is understood as a political and legal aspect of globalization. In recent decades, global governance theories have been adopted as a research program in the field of social sciences. Within the (neo)liberal institutionalism tradition, particularly, the interdependence theories, global governance approaches consider the consolidation of international cooperation and the transformation of the global system in which the anarchical system of sovereign national states is considered as a multilayer system including nongovernmental subjects. The researchers try to model power as “governance” without subjects which  are formally justified and entitled with the use of force monopoly. The future of global governance is connected with effective international law able to timely settle the arising disputes and deter possible aggression which, in the age of civilizational confrontation, can lead to the last war in human history. The effectiveness of global governance depends on what globalization direction the leading civilizations will choose: the force-based American way, or the way taking into account the interests of most peoples of the world. 

Keywords: world order, world politics, confrontation of civilizations, liberal concepts, international law, Western political science, globalization, Global governance, global peace, political science
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

Wilkinson R. The Global Governance Reader. Psychology Press, 2005.
Kirton J., Larionova M. Accountability for Effectiveness in Global Governance. Routledge, 2017.
Ocampo J. A. Global Governance and Development. Oxford University Press, 2016.
Yakunin V.I., Bagdasaryan V.E., Kulikov V.I., Sulakshin S.S. Variativnost' i tsiklichnost' global'nogo sotsial'nogo razvitiya chelovechestva. M.: Nauchnyi ekspert, 2009.
Kovalev A.A., Shcherbakova E.E. Zapadnye uchenye o regional'nom i global'nom upravlenii: issledovanie sootnoshenii i svyazei // Voprosy upravleniya. 2019. №5. S. 89-103.
Zhuzha D.Yu. Politicheskie aspekty global'nogo upravleniya prirodnymi resursami. Dissertatsiya na soiskanie uchenoi stepeni kandidata politicheskikh nauk. 23.00.04. M., 2012.
Nemchuk A.A. Global'noe upravlenie v sovremennom mire: politologicheskii analiz. Dissertatsiya na soiskanie uchenoi stepeni doktora politicheskikh nauk. 23.00.04. M., 2004.
Pavlenko V.B. Institutsional'nye aspekty global'nogo upravleniya politicheskimi protsessami. Dissertatsiya na soiskanie uchenoi stepeni doktora politicheskikh nauk. 23.00.02. M., 2008.
Sokolenko V.G. Stanovlenie sistemy upravleniya global'nym razvitiem. Dissertatsiya na soiskanie uchenoi stepeni doktora politicheskikh nauk. 23.00.04. M., 2000.
Golitsyn V.A., Barabanov O.N., Tereshchenko V.V. Global'noe upravlenie. M.: MGIMO-Universitet, 2006.
Barabanov O.N. Problema global'nogo upravleniya: vybor analiticheskoi paradigmy // Vestnik mezhdunarodnykh organizatsii: obrazovanie, nauka, novaya ekonomika. 2009. T.4. № 2. S. 5–13.
Gainutdinova L.A. Rol' grazhdanskogo obshchestva v sisteme global'nogo upravleniya // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 12. Politicheskie nauki. 2009. №5. S. 95-108.
Drobot G.A. Problema global'nogo upravleniya v kontekste teorii mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii // Vek globalizatsii.2011. №2(8). S. 41-52.
Efremova K.A. Formirovanie «Novogo mirovogo poryadka»: teoreticheskie interpretatsii i prakticheskaya realizatsiya // Sravnitel'naya politika. 2016. № 2. S. 5-13.
Korobeinikova L.A., Demirkhan S. Interpretatsiya vlasti v politicheskikh kontseptsiyakh globalizatsii // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Kul'turologiya i iskusstvovedenie. 2015. № 4. S. 104-108.
Lebedeva M.M., Kharkevich M.V. Teoriya mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii v zerkale sovremennykh rossiiskikh issledovanii // Vestnik MGIMO universiteta. 2015. № 5. S. 7-19.
Solyanova M.V. Problema mirovogo poryadka v sovremennykh zapadnykh issledovaniyakh // Vestnik MGIMO Universiteta. 2016. № 5. S. 34-47.
Stetsko E.V. «Global'noe upravlenie» i rol' nepravitel'stvennykh organizatsii v ego stanovlenii //Obshchestvo. Sreda. Razvitie (Terra Humana). 2012. № 4. S. 110-115.
Kharkevich M.V. Regional'noe upravlenie: opyt postroeniya mnogourovnevoi modeli sravnitel'nogo regionalizma // Politiya: Analiz. Khronika. Prognoz (Zhurnal politicheskoi filosofii i sotsiologii politiki). 2017. № 2(85). S. 129-145.
Tsygankov P.A. Issledovaniya problem miroporyadka: teoreticheskie trudnosti, raskhozhdeniya traktovok // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Politologiya. 2018. № 41. S. 194-202.
Rosenau J.N. The Study of World Politics. Taylor & Francis, 2006.
Rosenau J.N. Turbulence in World Politics: A Theory of Change and Continuity. Princeton University Press, 2018.
Weiss T.G., Wilkinson R. Rethinking Global Governance. John Wiley & Sons, 2019.
Rüdiger W., Röben V. Legitimacy in International Law. Springer Science & Business Media, 2008.
Cann D.M., Yates J. These Estimable Courts: Understanding Public Perceptions of State Judicial Institutions and Legal Policy-making. Oxford University Press, 2016.
Williams J. Legitimacy in International Relations and the Rise and Fall of Yugoslavia. Springer, 2016.
Weber M. General Economic History. Courier Corporation, 2012.
Clark I. Legitimacy in International Society. OUP Oxford, 2005.
Moravcsik A. The Choice for Europe: Social Purpose and State Power from Messina to Maastricht. Routledge, 2013.
Majone G. Dilemmas of European Integration: The Ambiguities and Pitfalls of Integration by Stealth. Oxford University Press, 2009.
Westergren M. The Political Legitimacy of Global Governance Institutions: A Justice-based Account. Stockholm University, 2016.
Steffek J. Embedded Liberalism and Its Critics: Justifying Global Governance in the American Century. Palgrave Macmillan, 2006.
Bekkers V., Dijkstra G., Fenger M. Governance and the Democratic Deficit: Assessing the Democratic Legitimacy of Governance Practices. Routledge, 2016.
Alvarez J.E., Sauvant K.P. The Evolving International Investment Regime: Expectations, Realities, Options. Oxford University Press, 2011.
Williams M.S. Voice, Trust, and Memory: Marginalized Groups and the Failings of Liberal Representation. Princeton University Press, 2000.
Tankebe J., Liebling A. Legitimacy and Criminal Justice: An International Exploration. OUP Oxford, 2013.
Fichtelberg A. Crime Without Borders: An Introduction to International Criminal Justice. Pearson/Prentice Hall, 2008.
Offe C., Tocqueville C. Reflections on America: Tocqueville, Weber and Adorno in the United States. Polity, 2005.
Dugin A.G. Geopolitika postmoderna: vremena novykh imperii. Ocherki geopolitiki XXI veka. SPb.: Amfora, 2007.
Partzsch L. Alternatives to Multilateralism: New Forms of Socialand Environmental Governance. MIT Press, 2020.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.

Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website