Статья 'Участие молодёжи в общественно-политической жизни США в 2020 году' - журнал 'Мировая политика' - NotaBene.ru
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial board
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!
При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.
По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
World Politics
Reference:

Youth participation in socio-political life of the U.S. in 2020

Butorov Aleksei Sergeevich

PhD in History

Senior lecturer at the Department of Theory and History of International Relations of RUDN

117198, Russia, g. Moscow, ul. Miklukho-Maklaya, 6

butorov-as@rudn.ru
Bulkin Viktor Vyacheslavovich

Master's degree at the Department of Theory and History of International Relations of RUDN

117198, Russia, g. Moscow, ul. Miklukho-Maklaya, 6

bulkin.vitya2011@yandex.ru

DOI:

10.25136/2409-8671.2021.1.35166

Review date:

04-03-2021


Publish date:

12-03-2021


Abstract: The object of the research is the participation of American youth in socio-political life of the country in 2020. The authors consider the main prerequisites and processes of youth participation in protests. The article contains the review and analysis of the most significant reasons of youth participation in protests. The authors study the growth of protest sentiment in the U.S. as a result of the recent escalation of socio-political and socio-cultural conflicts strengthened by the range of political, ethnic, and race factors and the COVID-19 pandemic. Special attention is given to the analysis of the role and importance of youth participation in the presidential election campaign in 2020, and the peculiarities of the influence of social media on the involvement of youth into the election process and protest movement.
The scientific novelty of the research consists in the fact that the role of youth is socio-political life in the U.S. in the context of the escalation of socio-political and socio-cultural processes, aggravated by the COVID-19 pandemic, hasn’t been studied sufficiently enough in Russian academic discourse. The main conclusion of the research is as follows: the growth of protest sentiment in the U.S. is the result of the recent escalation of socio-political and socio-cultural conflicts aggravated by the COVID-19 pandemic. It is obvious that the role of youth in the modern political life in the U.S. will keep steadily growing.
 


Keywords: political participation, COVID-19, social networks, protests, presidential elections, American Youth, Donald Trump, social conflict, American society, USA
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Sogrin V.V. (2019) Sotsial'nye konflikty v SShA. Uchastniki i etapy // Novaya i Noveishaya istoriya. № 4. S. 6.
2.
Borovik B.C. Politicheskaya aktivnost' sovremennoi molodezhi (sostoyanie i problemy).-M.: Izdatel'stvo Instituta molodezhi, 1991.
3.
Zakharov S.N. Politicheskoe uchastie molodezhi v usloviyakh modernizatsii rossiiskogo obshchestva.-M., 2001.
4.
Shkaev D.G. Mentalitet molodezhi v postsovetskii period.-M.: INION RAN, 2009.-54 s.
5.
Kostrikin A.B. Molodezhnye ob''edineniya i ikh rol' v sotsial'no-ekonomicheskom razvitii gosudarstva.-M.: INION RAN, 2010.-S. 17-31.
6.
Popov V.R. Studencheskie obshchestvennye ob''edineniya v postsovetskoi Rossii.-M.: INION RAN, 2010.-S. 31-51.
7.
Selezneva A.V., Zinenko V.E. Politicheskaya aktivnost' rossiiskoi molodezhi: sovremennye tendentsii razvitiya // Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta, № 2, s. 192-208.
8.
Palitai I.S., Selezneva A.V., Popova S.Yu. Rekrutirovanie molodykh politicheskikh liderov v sovremennoi Rossii: kanaly, formy, tekhnologii // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, № 455, s. 68-77.
9.
Buckingham D. Young people, politics, and news media: Beyond political socialization // Oxford Review of Education.-1999.-25.-P. 171-184.
10.
Grossberg L. Why does neo-liberalism hate kids? The war on youth and the culture of politics // The Review of Education/Pedagogy / Cultural Studies.-2001.-23 (2).-P. 111-136.
11.
Torres M. Youth Activists in the Age of Postmodern Globalization.-University of Chicago, 2006.
12.
Alisson G. Nold. Engaging the Nation's Youth in Politics-2010.
13.
Popov N.P. (2019) Sotsial'no-politicheskie vzglyady amerikanskoi molodezhi i promezhutochnye vybory 2018 goda // Rossiya i Amerika v XXI veke. №1.
14.
Aleksandrov G.V. (2019) Politicheskaya aktivnost' amerikantsev aziatskogo proiskhozhdeniya: tendentsii i perspektivy // Rossiya i Amerika v XXI veke. №4.
15.
Rey Junco, Peter de Guzman, Kristian Lundberg, Abby Kiesa, Alberto Medina. Early Takeaways on What Worked to Reach Youth During the 2020 Election. CIRCLE. January 25, 2021. (https://circle.tufts.edu/latest-research/early-takeaways-what-worked-reach-youth-during-2020-election).
16.
Kristian Lundberg, Rey Junco. Deeply Affected by the Pandemic, Youth Are Committed to Helping Others. CIRCLE. July 14, 2020. (https://circle.tufts.edu/latest-research/deeply-affected-pandemic-youth-are-committed-helping-others).
17.
Sarah Andes, Abby Kiesa, Kristian Lundberg, Alberto Medina. Black Youth Have Less Experience With and Information About Voting by Mail. CIRCLE. October 15, 2020. (https://circle.tufts.edu/latest-research/black-youth-have-less-experience-and-information-about-voting-mail).
18.
James P. Walsh. Social media and moral panics: Assessing the effects of technological change on societal reaction. International Journal of Cultural Studies. March 28, 2020. (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7201200/).
19.
CIRCLE and Snapchat: Partners for Youth Media Creation and Voter Engagement. CIRCLE. September 25, 2020. (https://circle.tufts.edu/latest-research/circle-and-snapchat-partners-youth-media-creation-and-voter-engagement).
20.
Emma Renstrom, Julia Aspernas, Hanna Back. The young protester: the impact of belongingness needs on political engagement. Journal of Youth Studies. June 2, 2020. (https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13676261.2020.1768229).
21.
US Crisis Monitor Releases Full Data for 2020. The Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project (ACLED). February 5, 2021. (https://acleddata.com/acleddatanew/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/ACLED_BDI_USCM2020Release_2021.pdf).
22.
Amanda Barosso, Rachel Minkin. Recent protest attendees are more racially and ethnically diverse, younger than Americans overall. Pew Research Center. June 24, 2020. (https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2020/06/24/recent-protest-attendees-are-more-racially-and-ethnically-diverse-younger-than-americans-overall/).
23.
Mark Jurkowitz. Younger adults differ from older ones in perceptions of news about COVID-19, George Floyd protests. Pew Research Center. July 9, 2020. (https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2020/07/09/younger-adults-differ-from-older-ones-in-perceptions-of-news-about-covid-19-george-floyd-protests/);
24.
H. Tankovska. Social media and politics in the United States-Statistics & Facts. Statista. February 25, 2021. (https://www.statista.com/topics/3723/social-media-and-politics-in-the-united-states/).
25.
Thomas Fujiwara, Karsten Muller, Carlo Schwarz. The Effect of Social Media on Elections: Evidence from the United States. SSRN. October 27, 2020. (https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3719998).
26.
Joseph Kahne, Benjamin Bowyer. The Political Significance of Social Media Activity and Social Networks. Political Communication. Volume 35, 2018-Issue 3. (https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10584609.2018.1426662).
27.
Brook Auxier. Activism on social media varies by race and ethnicity, age, political party. Pew Research Center. July 13, 2020. (https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2020/07/13/activism-on-social-media-varies-by-race-and-ethnicity-age-political-party/).
28.
Erickson C. A. et al. Impact of acamprosate on behavior and brain-derived neurotrophic factor: an open-label study in youth with fragile X syndrome //Psychopharmacology. – 2013. – T. 228. – №. 1. – S. 75-84.
29.
Benedict R. Patterns of culture. – Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2005. – T. 8.
30.
Parsons T. et al. The structure of social action. – New York : Free press, 1949. – T. 491.
31.
Eisenstadt S. N. (ed.). Multiple modernities. – Routledge, 2017.
32.
Titma M., Tuma N. B., Roosma K. Education as a factor in intergenerational mobility in Soviet society //European Sociological Review. – 2003. – T. 19. – №. 3. – S. 281-297.
33.
Cohen S. Perceived stress in a probability sample of the United States. – 1988.
34.
Lord A., Willmot P. The process of overcoming denial in sexual offenders //Journal of Sexual Aggression. – 2004. – T. 10. – №. 1. – S. 51-61.
35.
Sagalaev V. A. et al. On adventive species in the flora of Volgograd and Volgograd Region //Botanicheskiĭ Zhurnal. – 2002. – T. 87. – №. 11. – S. 115-122.
36.
Schutz A. Alfred Schutz on phenomenology and social relations. – University of Chicago Press, 1970. – T. 360.
37.
Berger P. L. The sacred canopy: Elements of a sociological theory of religion. – Open Road Media, 2011.
38.
Mead L. M. Beyond entitlement. – Simon and Schuster, 2008.
39.
Blum D. W. Russian youth policy: Shaping the nation-state's future //SAIS Review of International Affairs. – 2006. – T. 26. – №. 2. – S. 95-108.
40.
Pyrma R.V. Elektoral'naya aktivnost' molodezhi v SShA, Velikobritanii, Frantsii, Germanii i Rossii. Sravnitel'noe issledovanie // Politiya, 2019. – № 4.-S.188-204.
41.
Mal'kevich A.A. (2007) «Povyshenie elektoral'noi aktivnosti molodezhi sovremennoi Rossii: problemy i puti resheniya» // Al'manakh sovremennoi nauki i obrazovaniya, № 7: 108—112
42.
Norris P. (2002) Democratic Phoenix: Reinventing Political Activism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43.
Sloam J. (2014) «New Voice, Less Equal: The Civic and Political Engagement of Young People in the United States and Europe» // Comparative Political Studies, vol. 47, no. 5: 663—688.
44.
Siurala L. (2002) Can Youth Make a Difference? Youth Policy Facing Diversity and Change. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
45.
Furlong A. and F.Cartmel. (2007) Young People and Social Change: New Perspectives. Berkshire: Open University Press.
46.
Dalton R. (2008) “Citizenship Norms and the Expansion of Political Participation” // Political Studies, vol. 56, no 1: 76—98.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website