Статья 'Сравнительный анализ федерализма в Австралии и Канаде' - журнал 'Международные отношения' - NotaBene.ru
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
International relations
Reference:

Сравнительный анализ федерализма в Австралии и Канаде

Karpovich Oleg Gennad'evich

Doctor of Politics

Deputy Director of the Insitute, Institue of Stategic Research and Forecasting of the People's Friendship University of Russia

101000, Russia, Moscow, Mikluho-Maklaya Street 6

karpovich40@mail.ru
Other publications by this author
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0641.2016.1.17131

Received:

28-11-2015


Published:

10-04-2016


Abstract: This article is devoted to the comparative analysis of federalism in Australia and Canada. The research object is the modern federalism as the organizing principle of the Union State and the federal structure of Australia and Canada. The research subject is the similarities and differences in the models of the Federation of Australia (Commonwealth of Australia) and Canada (which is a constitutional monarchy and, at the same time, a federal state). The purpose of the research is to identify the major similarities and differences between the models of federal state in Australia and Canada.The methodological basis of the research is the system, structural and functional, and comparative political approaches, the methods of analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction, and observation.The author draws attention to the fact that federalism in Australia, as opposed to federalism in Canada, is more harmonious and balanced, despite the similar conditions of states creating and taking into account their common colonial past. At the same time, the Australian federalism is characterized by a number of paradoxes which differ the Australian model from the Canadian one and condition its internal inconsistency. 


Keywords:

geopolitics, federalism, world policy, global instability, international relations, diplomacy, interests, state, security, risks

References
1. Sobranie konstitutsionnykh aktov : [V 5-ti vyp.].-M. : V. M. Sablin, 1905-1906.-(Politicheskaya biblioteka; № 3). Vyp. 5 : Konstitutsii: Avstralii. Yaponii. Bel'gii.-1906.-2, 46 s. .-(Politicheskaya biblioteka; № 3).
2. Milne D. The Hew Canadian Constitution. – Toronto: James Jorimer & Company, Publishers, 1982.-240 s..
3. McWhinneu E. Canada and the Constitution, 1979-l982.-Toronto, 1982.-241 c.
4. Burdukova I.I., Chistyakov A.N., Borzova E.P. Politicheskie i izbiratel'nye sistemy. Gosudarstva Britanskogo sodruzhestva. SPbKO, 2013.
5. Mochalov A.N. Sravnitel'nyi federalizm Rossii i Avstralii. M. 2012 .
6. Gontareva I.B. Politicheskii analiz kontseptsii federalizma. – Orenburg: Yuzhnyi Ural 202 g. – 340 s.
7. Richard P. Natan, Erik P. Khoffmann Sovremennyi federalizm. Sovremennyi federalizm // Mezhdunarodnaya zhizn'.-1991.-№ 4.
8. Manoilo A.V. Ukrainskii krizis i «upravlyaemyi khaos»: sled «tsvetnykh revolyutsii» Arabskoi Vesny. // Vlast'. 2014. №4. S. 24-28.
9. Manoilo A.V. Informatsionnoe protivoborstvo v usloviyakh psikhologicheskoi voiny. // Zakon i pravo.-2003.-№12. – S. 31-34.
10. Sledzevskii I.V., Filippov V.R., Khabenskaya E.O. Vliyanie SMI na formirovanie etnicheskikh stereotipov obshchestvennogo soznaniya v stolichnom megapolise. M., 2005.
11. Filippov V.R. Sovetskaya teoriya etnosa. Istoriograficheskii ocherk / Ser. Istoriya nauki. M., 2010.
12. Filippova E.I., Filippov V.R. Gosudarstvo i obshchestvo pered litsom sotsial'nogo krizisa (dve paradigmy: rossiiskaya i frantsuzskaya) // Ezhegodnyi doklad Seti etnologicheskogo monitoringa i rannego preduprezhdeniya konfliktov. 2005. Moskva, 2006. S. 12-25.
13. Karpovich O.G. Mezhdunarodnye organizatsii i ikh rol' v preduprezhdenii, uregulirovanii i razreshenii etnopoliticheskikh konfliktov // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. - 2014. - 3. - C. 398 - 405. DOI: 10.7256/2073-8560.2014.3.11786.
14. Bunevich D.S. Krymskii krizis 2014 goda i sozdanie novoi arkhitektury mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii // Konfliktologiya / nota bene. - 2015. - 2. - C. 133 - 139. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8965.2015.2.14333.
15. Raikhlin E.I. Avraam Linkol'n i vtoraya amerikanskaya revolyutsiya // Mirovaya politika. - 2014. - 2. - C. 62 - 85. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8671.2014.2.9464. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/wi/article_9464.html
16. Raikhlin E.I. Sotvorili li oni istoriyu ili istoriya sotvorila ikh? // Mirovaya politika. - 2013. - 4. - C. 27 - 46. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8671.2013.4.9421. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/wi/article_9421.html
17. Filippov V.R. Territorial'nye konflikty i perspektiva izmeneniya granits na afrikanskom kontinente // Konfliktologiya / nota bene. - 2014. - 1. - C. 28 - 39. DOI: 10.7256/.2014.1.13041.
18. Karpovich O.G. Global'nye problemy mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii v kontekste formiruyushchegosya mnogopolyarnogo mira // Pravo i politika. - 2014. - 5. - C. 620 - 629. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2014.5.11787.
19. Skripnichenko D.V. Territorial'noe i natsional'noe izmerenie federalizma // Trendy i upravlenie. - 2014. - 1. - C. 21 - 25. DOI: 10.7256/2307-9118.2014.1.10774.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.