Kuznetsov I.I.
The impact of demonstration effects on the development of political institutions
// International relations.
2015. ¹ 4.
P. 412-425.
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0641.2015.4.17162 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=17162
Abstract: The paper presents an approach to the analysis of the dynamics of political institutions in Russia through the prism of the impact of demonstration effects. The object of the research is political process in non-Western societies. The subject of the research is the development of political institutions in Russia. On the base of the approaches, prevailing in the domestic and foreign political science, the author examines the possibility of political change in the comparative perspective. The purpose is to reveal the characteristics of the impact of demonstration effects. The author outlines the basic problems of the improvement of the institutional design of political systems in the context of global communication and dissemination of ideas about the contemporary experience of the organization and functioning of public authority. The methodology of the study is based on the systems approach, the structural-functional and comparative-political approaches, the methods of analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction and observation.The author points at the need for a serious study of the possibilities and limitations of the universalist approach to "democracy promotion." Taking into account the experience of the contemporary "post-conflict regulation" in a number of countries in the world, the author concludes about the need for a balanced assessment of the native experience of political institutions, the provision of the sustainable statehood and political responsibility of the authority.
References
1. Arato A. The New Democracies and American Constitutional Design // Constellations. 2000. September. Vol. 7. P. 316–340.
2. Buhbe M., Gorzka G. Russland heute. Rezentralisierung des Staates unter Putin. Wiesbaden, VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 2007;
3. Carothers Th. U.S. Democracy Promotion During and After Bush / Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Washington, 2007.
4. Counterinsurgency and constitutional design // Harvard Law Review. 2008. Vol. 121. P. 1622–1643.
5. Diamond L. Building Democracy After Conflict: Lessons from Iraq // Journal of Democracy. 2005. January. Vol. 16. P. 9–23.
6. Diamond L. Promoting Democracy in Post-Conflict and Failed States: Lessons and Challenges // Taiwan Journal of Democracy. 2006. Vol. 2. ¹ 2. P. 93–116.
7. Dobbins J. et al. America’s Role in Nation-Building: From Germany to Iraq. Santa Monica: RAND, 2003.
8. Dobbins J., Jones S.G., Srane K., Degrasse B.C. The beginner’s guide to nation-building. Santa Monica: RAND, National Security Research Division, 2007.
9. Elster J., Offe C., Preuss U. Institutional Design in Post-Communist Societies: Rebuilding the Ship at Sea / Ed. by R E. Goodin. Theories of Institutional Design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
10. Goldfarb A., Litwinenko M. Tod eines Dissidenten. Warum Alexander Litwinenko sterben musste. Hamburg: Hoffmann und Campe Verlag, 2007;
11. Goldman M.I., MyerJ.J. Petrostate: Putin, Power and the New Russia. Oxford University Press, 2008;
12. Grimm D. Constitutional Reform in Germany after the Revolution of 1989 // Constitutional Policy and Change in Europe / Ed. by J.J. Hesse, N. Johnson. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 1995. P. 129–151.
13. Haug R. Die Kreml AG. Putin, Russland und die Deutschen. Stuttgart: Hohenheim Verlag, 2007;
14. Levine Steve Putin's Labyrinth: Spies, Murder, and the Dark Heart of the New Russia. Random House Trade Paperbacks, 2009;
15. Lucas Ed. Der Kalte Krieg des Kreml. Wie das Putin-System Russland und den Westen bedroht. München: Riemann Verlag, 2008.
16. Mommsen M., Nußberger A. Das System Putin. Gelenkte Demokratie und politische Justiz in Russland. München: C. H. Beck Verlag, 2007;
17. Nye J.S. Jr. Bound to lead: the changing nature of American power. N.-Y.: Basic Books, 1990.
18. Ordeshook P. Constitutions for new democracies: Reflections of turmoil or agents of stability? // Public Choice. 1997. ¹ 90. P. 55–72.
19. Otake H. Two Contrasting Constitutions in the Postwar World: The Making of the Japanese and the West German Constitutions // Five Decades of Constitutionalism in Japanese Society / Ed. by Y. Higuchi. Tokyo: Tokyo Univ. Press, 2000.
20. Reitschuster B. Putins Demokratur. Wie der Kreml den Westen das Fürchten lehrt. Berlin: Econ Verlag, 2006;
21. Reynolds A. Constitutional Medicine // Journal of Democracy. 2005. January. Vol. 16. ¹ 1. P. 54–68.
22. Samuels K. Post-Conflict Peace-Building and Constitution-Making // Chicago Journal of International Law. 2006. Winter. Vol. 6. ¹. 2. P. 1–19.
23. Samuels K. State-building and Constitutional Design after Conflict // IPA REPORT. 2006. June. 23 p. [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: http://www.odi.org.uk/events/¬states_06/-18thmay/presentations/20samuels.pdf.
24. The Theory and Practice of Institutional Transplantation: Experiencies with the Transfer of Policy Institutions / Ed. by M. de Jong, K. Lalenis and V. Mammadouh. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002. P. 283.
25. Wegren St. K. (Ed.). Herspring D.R. (Ed.) After Putin's Russia: Past Imperfect, Future Uncertain. 4 ed. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc., 2009.
26. Vel'tsel' K., Ingelkhart R. Kak razvitie vedet k demokratii // Rossiya v global'noi politike. 2009. Mai-iyun'. ¹ 3.
27. Vol'ton T. KGB vo Frantsii. M.: Tsentrpoligraf, 2000.
28. Vol'ton T. Chtoby ponyat', kuda idet Rossiya, posmotrite na Kitai. [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: http://www.inosmi.ru/world/20080107/238761.html. (perevod iz «Le Figaro», Frantsiya).
29. Vorozheikina T.E. Avtoritarnye rezhimy KhKh veka i sovremennaya Rossiya: skhodstva i otlichiya // Tez. vystup. na konf. «Rossiiskie al'ternativy». (Pyatye Khodorkovskie chteniya). 8 dekabrya 2009 g. [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: http://www.memo.ru/-2009/12/12/vorozhey¬kina.htm.
30. Garr T.G. Pochemu lyudi buntuyut. SPb., 2005. S.147.
31. Kolerov M. Komiks o «Nevoyuyushchikh demokratiyakh» // Tam zhe. Russkii zhurnal — Tema nedeli. 2009. Sentyabr'. ¹ 21. S. 17.
32. Kulagin V.M. Mezhdunarodnaya bezopasnost'. M.: Aspekt-Press, 2006;
33. Kulagin V.M. Mir v XXI veke: mnogopolyusnyi balans sil ili global'nyi Pax Democratica? Gipoteza «demokraticheskogo mira» v kontekste al'ternativ mirovogo razvitiya // Polis. 2000. ¹ 1;
34. Lafitskii V.I. Mekhanizmy vozdeistviya protsessov globalizatsii na konstitutsionnyi stroi // Realizatsiya Konstitutsii: ot idei k praktike razvitiya konstitutsionnogo stroya (sostoyanie i perspektivy rossiiskogo konstitutsionalizma na obshchemirovom fone). Mezhdunarodnoe issledovanie. // Konstitutsionnyi vestnik. 2008. ¹ 1(19). S. 311.
35. Medushevskii A.N. Eksport konstitutsionalizma: amerikanskaya model' v Yaponii i Germanii // Kosmopolis. 2006. Vesna. ¹ 1(15). S. 146.
36. Nureev R.M., Latov Yu.V. Karl Polan'i — nash sovremennik // «Velikaya transformatsiya» Karla Polan'i: proshloe, nastoyashchee, budushchee / Pod obshch. red. prof. R.M. Nu¬reeva. M.: Izd. dom GU VShE, 2006. S. 11.
37. Obshchaya i prikladnaya politologiya: Ucheb. posobie / Pod obshch. red. V.I. Zhukova, B.I. Krasnova. M.: MGSU; Izd-vo «Soyuz», 1997. S. 530.
38. Oleinik A.N. Institutsional'naya ekonomika. M., 2000. S. 202–204.
39. Offe K. Dilemma odnovremennosti: demokratizatsiya i rynochnaya ekonomika v Vostochnoi Evrope // Povoroty istorii: Postsotsialisticheskie transformatsii glazami nemetskikh issledovatelei T. 2: Postsotsialisticheskie transformatsii v sravnitel'noi perspek¬tive. SPb., M., Berlin, 2003. S. 11.
40. Petruchak L.A. Problemy vozniknoveniya, razvitiya i formirovaniya pravil otsenki dokazatel'stv v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve Rossii: Istoriko-pravovoi aspekt: Avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. Stavropol', 2000. S. 6.
41. Raizberg B.A., Lozovskii L.Sh., Starodubtseva E.B. Sovremennyi ekonomicheskii slovar'. 5-e izd., pererab. i dop. M., 2007.
42. Singer D. Dzh. Normy zdorovogo obshchestva — vot neobkhodimye standarty //
43. Solov'ev A.I. Institutsional'nyi dizain rossiiskoi vlasti: istoricheskii remeik ili matritsa razvitiya?// Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost'. 2004. ¹1. S. 64-76.
44. Solov'ev A.I. Causae i kaverzy politicheskoi demokratii.// Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost'. 1998. ¹6. S. 71-84;
45. Tkachenko S.V. Pravovye reformy v Rossii: problemy retseptsii zapadnogo prava. Samara, 2007. S. 363.
46. Tkachenko S.V. Retseptsiya zapadnogo prava v Rossii: problemy vzaimodeistviya sub''ektov. Samara, 2009. S. 5.
47. Tribrat V. «Myagkaya bezopasnost'» po Dzhozefu Nayu // Mezhdunarodnye protsessy. 2005. Yanvar'-aprel'. T. 3, ¹ 1 (7).
48. Filippova N.A. Bikameralizm v postsovetskikh gosudarstvakh: tendentsii razvitiya instituta // Politeks: politicheskaya ekspertiza: al'manakh. Vyp. 3. SPb., 2005. S. 37.
49. Tsygankov P.A. Teoriya mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniya. M., 2003;
50. Tsygankov P.A. Tsygankov A.P. Sotsiologiya mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii. M., 2006.
51. Tsygankov P.A., Tsygankov A.P. Krizis idei «demokraticheskogo mira».// Mezhdunarodnye protsessy. 2005 Tom 3. ¹ 3(9). Sentyabr'-dekabr'.
52. Manoilo A.V. Geopoliticheskaya kartina sovremennogo mira i upravlyaemyi khaos // Mirovaya politika. - 2015. - 1. - C. 66 - 80. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8671.2015.1.12665. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/wi/article_12665.html
53. Karpovich O.G. Mezhdunarodnye organizatsii i ikh rol' v preduprezhdenii, uregulirovanii i razreshenii etnopoliticheskikh konfliktov // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. - 2014. - 3. - C. 398 - 405. DOI: 10.7256/2073-8560.2014.3.11786.
54. Veprintsev V.B. Vliyanie informatsionnoi sostavlyayushchei na vzaimodeistvie geopoliticheskikh sub''ektov // Mirovaya politika. - 2015. - 1. - C. 192 - 212. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8671.2015.1.12621. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/wi/article_12621.html
55. Galves Derolle P. Brazil – New Age // Konfliktologiya / nota bene. - 2014. - 1. - C. 136 - 139. DOI: 10.7256/.2014.1.13181.
56. Kalachev D.N. Osnovnye napravleniya sotrudnichestva Rossii i NATO // Trendy i upravlenie. - 2015. - 1. - C. 36 - 43. DOI: 10.7256/2307-9118.2015.1.13712.
57. Bunevich D.S. Krymskii krizis 2014 goda i sozdanie novoi arkhitektury mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii // Konfliktologiya / nota bene. - 2015. - 2. - C. 133 - 139. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8965.2015.2.14333.
58. Filippov V.R. Territorial'nye konflikty i perspektiva izmeneniya granits na afrikanskom kontinente // Konfliktologiya / nota bene. - 2014. - 1. - C. 28 - 39. DOI: 10.7256/.2014.1.13041.
59. Vinogradova E.A. Rol' publichnoi diplomatii ALBA v uregulirovanii siriiskogo konflikta // Mirovaya politika. - 2015. - 1. - C. 55 - 65. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8671.2015.1.12619. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/wi/article_12619.html
60. Borodinov E.N. Analiz krymskoi vneshnepoliticheskoi operatsii // Mirovaya politika. - 2015. - 1. - C. 81 - 88. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8671.2015.1.12586. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/wi/article_12586.html
61. Veprintsev V.B. Vliyanie informatsionnoi sostavlyayushchei na vzaimodeistvie geopoliticheskikh sub''ektov // Mirovaya politika. - 2015. - 1. - C. 192 - 212. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8671.2015.1.12621. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/wi/article_12621.html
Link to this article
You can simply select and copy link from below text field.
