Kashulin D.A.
Trans-Pacific Partnership: reasons of creation and possible political consequences
// International relations.
2016. № 1.
P. 37-42.
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0641.2016.1.17814 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=17814
Транстихоокеанское партнерство: причины создания и возможные политические последствия
Kashulin Danila Aleksandrovich
Postgraduate Student at Moscow State University, Department of History and Theory of Politics
119991, Russia, Moscow, ul. Lomonosovskii Prospekt, 27, korp. 4
Abstract: The research object is Trans-Pacific Partnership, the research subject is the reasons and the aims of creating a new trade block. The aim of the study is to outline the possible political and economic consequences of the emergence of a new large regional association for the world economy and politics. The author studies the history of the Partnership’s creation, the set of its member-states and their interests, according to the promulgated text of the treaty and the analysis of the existing balance of power in the region. Special attention is paid to the USA as an initiator of the new block and its “Pacific shift” and the countries whose interests are affected but not taken into account – China and Russia. The research methodology is based on the historical, system, and comparative-political methods, political and economic analysis, the methods of induction, deduction, and observation. The author notes that the USA have launched the shift in the balance of power in the Asia-Pacific region aimed at the weakening of their main rival in the region, China, and at the preservation of a unipolar world and financial system based on the American currency. The creation of the Trans-Pacific Partnership may lead to the split of the region into the opposing blocks and to the escalation of tensions.
Keywords:
Trans-Pacific Partnership, world economy, international relations, territorial conflicts, geopolitics, cooperation, transport corridor, transnational corporations, international trade regulations, international monetary system
References
1. Clinton H. America’s Pacific Century//Foreign Affairs.-November 2011. URL: https://foreignpolicy.com/2011/10/11/americas-pacific-century/
2. Sokhranenie global'nogo liderstva SShA. Prioritety dlya vooruzhennykh sil v XXI veke. Novyi obzor oboronnoi strategii SShA [Elektronnyi resurs]// Zarubezhnoe voennoe obozrenie.-2012.-№ 6.-S. 118-128.
3. Security Treaty between Australia, New Zealand and the United States of America, ANZUS.-San Francisco, 1 September 1951. URL: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/other/dfat/treaties/1952/2.htm
4. Kitai predupredil SShA o vozmozhnom nachale voiny//Izvestiya. – 30.10.2015. URL: http://izvestia.ru/news/594411
5. Obama: pravila mirovoi torgovli budut diktovat' SShA, a ne Kitai// Ekonomika segodnya. – 05.10.2015. URL: http://rueconomics.ru/106567-obama-pravila-mirovoy-torgovli-budut-diktovat-ssha-a-ne-kitay/
6. Stepanov I. A. Transtikhookeanskoe partnerstvo: bar'ery i perspektivy razvitiya [Elektronnyi resurs]//Rossiya v global'noi politike. – 09.10.2015. URL: http://www.globalaffairs.ru/global-processes/Transtikhookeanskoe-partnerstvo-barery-i-perspektivy-razvitiya-17733
7. Summary of the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement// The Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR). URL: https://ustr.gov/about-us/policy-offices/press-office/press-releases/2015/october/summary-trans-pacific-partnership
8. Simonov K., Khazin M. Transtikhookeanskoe partnerstvo: komu vykruchivaet ruki Vashington [Elektronnyi resurs]//Vesti.-07.10.2015. URL: http://so-l.ru/news/show/transtihookeanskoe_partnerstvo_komu_vikruchivaet_r
9. Transtikhookeanskoe partnerstvo: proryv ili fars? [Elektronnyi resurs]// Vesti.-06.10.2015. URL: http://www.vestifinance.ru/articles/63054
10. Ofitsial'nyi sait ZAO «Sankt-Peterburgskaya Mezhdunarodnaya Tovarno-syr'evaya Birzha». URL: http://spimex.com/about/about/
11. Interv'yu Vladimira Putina vedushchim kitaiskim SMI [Elektronnyi resurs]// Putin segodnya.-07.11.2014. URL: http://www.putin-today.ru/archives/6680
12. Kitai vystupaet za to, chtoby VREP i TTP sodeistvovali razvitiyu ATR// RIA Novosti.-08.10.2015. URL: http://ria.ru/economy/20151008/1298787302.html
13. Kadochnikov P. A., Ponomareva O. V. Formirovanie Vseob''emlyushchego regional'nogo ekonomicheskogo partnerstva: perspektivy i posledstviya// Rossiiskii vneshneekonomicheskii vestnik, 2014.-№10.-S. 3-10.
14. Politologi: TTP ne pomeshaet Rossii, odnako mozhet otrazit'sya na Kitae//RIA Novosti. – 05.10.2015. URL: http://ria.ru/world/20151005/1297232593.html
15. Rossiya i Singapur nachnut konsul'tatsii po sozdaniyu ZST// Interfaks. – 17.11.2015. URL: http://www.interfax.ru/business/479838
16. Shokhin A. Protiv kogo druzhat? (O sozdanii Transtikhookeanskogo partnerstva) [Elektronnyi resurs]// Ogonek, 12.10.2015.-№40. URL: http://www.kommersant.ru/Doc/2826750
17. Bairektarevich A. Why is (the Korean peninsula and East) Asia unable to capitalize (on) its successes: Asia needs ASEAN-ization not Pakistanization of its continent // Konfliktologiya / nota bene. - 2014. - 1. - C. 59 - 64. DOI: 10.7256/.2014.1.13520.
18. Manoilo A.V. Rol' strategii upravlyaemogo khaosa v formirovanii novogo miroporyadka // Pravo i politika. - 2014. - 5. - C. 638 - 651. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2014.5.11816.
Link to this article
You can simply select and copy link from below text field.
